Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
103552po1-pdf•United States of America v. MICHAEL WRIGHT and RANDALL WRIGHT
103552po1-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit06.07.2012
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 10-3552
_____________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellant
v.
MICHAEL WRIGHT and
RANDALL WRIGHT
__________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Nos. 5:09-cr-00270-001 & 5:09-cr-00270-002)
District Judge: Honorable Lawrence F. Stengel
Present: McKEE, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, SCIRICA, RENDELL, AMBRO,
FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN,
GREENAWAY, JR., VANASKIE, and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges
ORDER
Upon further consideration, this Court concludes that rehearing en banc is not
necessary in the above-captioned case. Accordingly, the order of this Court, dated July 6,
2012, ordering rehearing en banc is hereby vacated.
By the Court,
/s/ Theodore A. McKee
Chief Circuit Judge
Dated: July 11, 2012
Smw/cc: Robert A. Zauzmer, Esq.
Mark S. Greenberg, Esq.
Michael N. Huff, Esq.
-- 1 of 1 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.