Vizant Technologies LLC; Joseph Bizzarro v. JULIE P. WHITCHURCH; JAMIE DAVIS, individuals

NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 16-1178
___________
VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC;
JOSEPH BIZZARRO
v.
JULIE P. WHITCHURCH;
*JAMIE DAVIS, individuals,
Appellants
*Dismissed pursuant to Court’s Order dated 06/29/2016
____________________________________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Civil No. 2-15-cv-00431)
District Judge: Honorable Harvey Bartle III
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
January 5, 2017
Before: SHWARTZ, COWEN and FUENTES, Circuit Judges
___________
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
___________
It appears that the opinion filed January 13, 2017 incorrectly referred to injunction
entered the District Court as a preliminary rather than a permanent injunction.
Accordingly, it is hereby O R D R E D at the direction of the Court the opinion shall be
amended as follows:

-- 1 of 2 --

For these reasons, appellees’ motion to dismiss this appeal is granted in part, and
we will dismiss this appeal as to all orders except (1) the order entering summary
judgment and the interlocutory orders related to that issue, (2) the permanent
injunction, and (3) the order at ECF No. 215 denying Whitchurch’s Rule 60(b)
motion.
The Clerk is directed to file an amended opinion. As the error was typographical in
nature the filed date of the judgment shall not be altered.
For the Court,
Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk
Date: February 2, 2017

-- 2 of 2 --