Ali Razak v. Uber Technologies, Inc.; Gegen, LLC

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
______________
No. 18-1944
______________
ALI RAZAK; KENAN SABANI; KHALDOUN CHERDOUD, INDIVIDUALLY AND
ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
Appellants
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; GEGEN, LLC
______________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Civil No. 2-16-cv-00573)
District Judge: Hon. Michael M. Baylson
______________
Argued January 15, 2019
______________
Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, GREENAWAY, JR., and PORTER, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AMENDING PRECEDENTIAL OPINION
.
The panel hereby ORDERS that the Opinion filed March 3, 2020 be amended to
include the language appearing in angle brackets below.
The sentence at page 16 reading, “But, if a court finds that there are any issues of
fact that remain in dispute, it must resolve those disputes prior to granting summary
judgment” shall be amended to read: “But, if a court finds that there are any issues of
<material> fact that remain in <genuine> dispute, it must resolve those disputes prior to
granting summary judgment.”

-- 1 of 2 --

The sentence at page 17 reading, “DialAmerica teaches that where there are questions of
fact that need resolution, these questions must go to a fact-finder” shall be amended to
read: “DialAmerica teaches that where there are <genuine> questions of <material> fact
that need resolution, these questions must go to a fact-finder.”
BY THE COURT,
s/ Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr.
Circuit Judge
Dated: November 5, 2020
Tmm/cc: All Counsel of Record

-- 2 of 2 --