Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
00-2469•In re: Computer Dynamics, Incorporated
00-2469Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.05.2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2469
In Re: COMPUTER DYNAMICS, INCORPORATED,
Debtor.
STEPHEN GARY MERRILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES TRUSTEE,
Party in Interest - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CA-00-556-2, BK-95-23127-A)
Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 22, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen Merrill, GHENT LAW OFFICES, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellant.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Stephen Gary Merrill appeals from the district court’s order
affirming the bankruptcy court’s order which suspended his right to
practice before the bankruptcy court for the Eastern District of
Virginia. Our review of the record included on appeal, as well on
Merrill’s brief, discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Merrill v. United
States Trustee, Nos. CA-00-556-2; BK-95-23127-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 13,
2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.