Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-1791•John Klar v. Seterus, Inc.; Federal National Mortgage Association
14-1791Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.12.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1791
JOHN KLAR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
MARCY KLAR,
Plaintiff,
v.
SETERUS, INC.; FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr.,
District Judge. (2:13-cv-00462-JAG)
Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Klar, Appellant Pro Se. Terry Catherine Frank, KAUFMAN &
CANOLES, PC, Richmond, Virginia, Christy Lee Murphy, KAUFMAN &
CANOLES, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Klar appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his civil action with prejudice after he failed to
comply with a scheduling order and denying reconsideration. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Klar v. Seterus, Inc., No. 3:13-cv-00462-JAG (E.D. Va.
July 8, 2014; Aug. 5, 2014). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.