Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-1863•Kelso David Wallace v. BERNADETTE LAMSON, Assistant County Attorney
14-1863Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.12.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1863
KELSO DAVID WALLACE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BERNADETTE LAMSON, Assistant County Attorney; DIANNA
GUNTHER; LINDA BIRD, Supervisor DHCA; MONTGOMERY COUNTY
MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 14-2274
KELSO DAVID WALLACE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BERNADETTE LAMSON, Assistant County Attorney; DIANNA
GUNTHER; LINDA BIRD, Supervisor DHCA; MONTGOMERY COUNTY
MARYLAND; MONTGOMERY COUNTY GOVERNMENT MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District
of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge.
(8:13-cv-00866-PWG; 8:14-cv-02089-PWG)
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kelso David Wallace, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Lowell
Frederick, Edward Barry Lattner, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE,
Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Kelso David Wallace
appeals from the district court’s orders denying relief on his
civil complaint and his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012). We have reviewed the records and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Wallace v. Lamson, No. 8:13-cv-00866-PWG
(D. Md. Mar. 11, 2014); Wallace v. Lamson, No. 8-14-cv-02089-PWG
(D. Md. Nov. 7, 2014). We deny Wallace’s motion for appointment
of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.