Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-1898•Peggy Pledger v. UHS-PRUITT CORPORATION, The Oaks at Mayview, a/k/a Mayview Convalescent Home, Inc.,…
14-1898Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26.01.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1898
PEGGY PLEDGER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UHS-PRUITT CORPORATION, The Oaks at Mayview, a/k/a Mayview
Convalescent Home, Inc., a/k/a Mayview Convalescent Center,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:12-cv-00484-F)
Submitted: January 22, 2015 Decided: January 26, 2015
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peggy Pledger, Appellant Pro Se. Benton Louis Toups, CRANFILL,
SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Peggy Pledger appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant in her
employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Pledger v. UHS-Pruitt
Corp., No. 5:12-cv-00484-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 5, 2014). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.