Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-1929•Dharmesh Vinodrai Mehta; Renu Dharmesh Mehta v. Sanjiv D. Shah; Kamini S. Shah
14-1929Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit09.03.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1929
DHARMESH VINODRAI MEHTA; RENU DHARMESH MEHTA,
Debtors - Appellants,
v.
SANJIV D. SHAH; KAMINI S. SHAH,
Creditors - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony J. Trenga,
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00025-AJT-TCB; 12-11061-BFK)
Submitted: February 27, 2015 Decided: March 9, 2015
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dharmesh Vinodrai Mehta, Renu Dharmesh Mehta, Appellants Pro Se.
Marc Allan Busman, BUSMAN & BUSMAN, PC, Fairfax Station,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dharmesh Vinodrai Mehta and Renu Dharmesh Mehta appeal the
district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order
denying a discharge in their underlying Chapter 7 proceeding.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the courts
below. Mehta v. Shah, No. 1:14-cv-00025-AJT-TCB (E.D. Va. Aug.
15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.