James M. Tennant v. GEORGETOWN, CITY OF, a Municipal Corporation

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2131
JAMES M. TENNANT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GEORGETOWN, CITY OF, a Municipal Corporation; PAUL GARDNER;
ANN MERCER; CINDY HOWARD; BRENDON M. BARBER, SR.; JACK M.
SCOVILLE, JR., in their individual and official capacities,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
DOUGLAS CHARLES BAXTER, in his individual capacity,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (2:12-cv-00370-RMG)
Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 19, 2015
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James M. Tennant, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Charles Baxter,
RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Myrtle Beach, South
Carolina, Michelle Parsons Kelley, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN &

-- 1 of 3 --

2
ROBINSON, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
James M. Tennant appeals the district court’s orders
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on Tennant’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, and
denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend that
judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Tennant v. City of Georgetown, No. 2:12-cv-
00370-RMG (D.S.C. Aug. 18, 2014 & Sept. 19, 2014). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --