Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-6011•Steven Louis Barnes, a/k/a Steve, a/k/a Big Man v. CAROL G. THUEME, Court Reporter; COURT ADMINISTRATION OFFICE
14-6011Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit05.03.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6011
STEVEN LOUIS BARNES, a/k/a Steve, a/k/a Big Man,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CAROL G. THUEME, Court Reporter; COURT ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (5:13-cv-02349-RMG)
Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 5, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Louis Barnes, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Steven Louis Barnes appeals the district court’s
orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and
denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Barnes v. Thueme, No.
5:13-cv-02349-RMG (D.S.C. Oct. 25 & Dec. 2, 2013). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.