Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-6273•United States of America v. William Lamont Slate, a/k/a Chicago
14-6273Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29.04.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6273
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM LAMONT SLATE, a/k/a Chicago,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith,
Chief District Judge. (4:97-cr-00041-RBS-2)
Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 29, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Lamont Slate, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey,
Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Lamont Slate appeals a district court order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(B) (2012) motion and his
petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons of the
district court. United States v. Slate, No. 4:97-cr-00041-RBS-2
(E.D. Va. Feb. 5, 2014). We deny Slate’s motion for appointment
of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.