Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-6283•Arthur Rodgers v. Warden Shearin; Greg Flury; Ava Joubert
14-6283Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23.06.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6283
ARTHUR RODGERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN SHEARIN; GREG FLURY; AVA JOUBERT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-02902-CCB)
Submitted: June 19, 2014 Decided: June 23, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur Rodgers, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Arthur Rodgers appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil
rights complaint for failure to comply with the court’s earlier
order to particularize and amend the complaint, and denying
Rodgers’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend that
judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Rodgers v. Shearin, No. 1:13-cv-02902-CCB
(D. Md. Jan. 31, 2014 & Feb. 27, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.