Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-6293•United States of America v. Nicholas James Queen
14-6293Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19.06.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6293
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
NICHOLAS JAMES QUEEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William N. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:93-cr-00366-WMN-1)
Submitted: June 17, 2014 Decided: June 19, 2014
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nicholas James Queen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Paul Michael
Cunningham, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nicholas James Queen, Sr., appeals the district
court’s order denying his motions for new trial, to amend, for
reconsideration of the court’s January 28, 2013, order, and for
relief from the court’s May 8, 1997, order. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Queen, No. 1:93-cr-00366-WMN-1 (D. Md. Feb. 11, 2014). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.