Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-6461•Eric M. Richardson v. William D. Quarles
14-6461Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.08.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6461
ERIC M. RICHARDSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM D. QUARLES,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-01154-GLR)
Submitted: July 29, 2014 Decided: August 1, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eric M. Richardson appeals the district court’s orders
denying his petition for a writ of mandamus and denying
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Richardson leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Richardson v. Quarles, No. 1:13-cv-01154-
GLR (D. Md. filed Feb. 28, 2014 & entered Mar. 4, 2014; filed
Mar. 25, 2014 & entered Mar. 26, 2014). We deny Richardson’s
petition to this court for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.