Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-7095•David Muhammad, a/k/a David William Stigger v. Warden Bobby Shearin
14-7095Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.12.2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7095
DAVID MUHAMMAD, a/k/a David William Stigger,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WARDEN BOBBY SHEARIN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-01072-ELH)
Submitted: December 2, 2014 Decided: December 4, 2014
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David William Stigger, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith
Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David William Stigger appeals the district court’s
orders denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to the
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act and 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Muhammad v. Warden Bobby Shearin, No.
1:13-cv-01072-ELH (D. Md. Oct. 17, 2013 & June 18, 2014). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.