David Bryant Wicks v. Walmart Department Stores

14-7152Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18.12.2014

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7152
DAVID BRYANT WICKS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WALMART DEPARTMENT STORES; JUSTIN SHERMAN; MIKE WHITE;
CAMBRIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOHN F. JONES; SALISBURY
POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER BARKLEY; CHRISTOPHER LANE;
GEORGE KALOROUMAKIS; WARDEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-02293-RDB)
Submitted: December 16, 2014 Decided: December 18, 2014
Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Bryant Wicks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
David Bryant Wicks appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Wicks v. Walmart Dep’t Stores, No. 1:14-cv-02293-RDB (D.
Md. filed July 28 & entered July 29, 2014). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.