Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-7486•Owaiian M. Jones v. United States District Court for Western District
14-7486Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19.02.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7486
OWAIIAN M. JONES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR WESTERN DISTRICT; MICHAEL
F. URBANSKI; JAMES JONES; ROBERT S. BALLOU; ROANOKE CITY
CIRCUIT COURT; ROANOKE CITY GENERAL DISTRICT COURT; ROANOKE
CITY JUVENILE DOMESTIC RELATIONS COURT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:14-cv-00499-GEC)
Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 19, 2015
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Owaiian M. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Owaiian Jones appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. United States
Dist. Ct. for the W. Dist. of Va., No. 7:14-cv-00499-GEC (W.D.
Va. Sept. 30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.