Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-7622•Kareem Jamal Currence v. E.K. CAULEY, Warden
14-7622Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.03.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7622
KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
E.K. CAULEY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00088)
Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 2, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kareem Jamal Currence, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kareem Jamal Currence appeals the district court’s
orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P.
59(e) motions, and he has filed an application to proceed in
forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Currence leave
to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Currence v. Cauley, No. 1:11-cv-
00088 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 8, 2014; Oct. 24, 2014). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.