Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
14-7653•Mark Corrigan v. United States of America
14-7653Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit02.03.2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7653
MARK CORRIGAN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh,
District Judge. (3:14-cv-00070-GMG-RWT)
Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 2, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark R. Corrigan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mark Corrigan filed a civil action petitioning for a
writ of error coram nobis to overturn his 1998 criminal
conviction and sentence. He appeals the district court’s order
adopting in part the magistrate judge’s recommendation and
dismissing the petition without prejudice for lack of subject
matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Corrigan v. United States, No. 3:14-cv-
00070-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 27, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.