Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-1992•Brad R. Johnson; Elci Wijayaningsih v. Abby Pope
15-1992Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit08.03.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1992
BRAD R. JOHNSON; ELCI WIJAYANINGSIH,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
ABBY POPE; ELIZABETH BILETH; WINFORD BARR; THOMAS G. WALKER;
JONATHAN D. CARROLL; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (7:13-cv-00078-BO)
Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 8, 2016
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brad Johnson, Elci Wijayaningsih, Appellants Pro Se. Lee Perla,
Paul Andrew Allulis, Richard Farber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Brad R. Johnson and Elci Wijayaningsih appeal the district
court’s order and judgment granting summary judgment to the
Appellees and dismissing their 26 U.S.C. § 7422 (2012) action
seeking to recover an alleged overpayment of taxes. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Johnson v. Pope, No. 7:13-cv-00078-BO (E.D.N.C. July 31, 2015).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.