In re: Raymond Edward Chestnut, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2134
In re: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1)
Submitted: November 18, 2015 Decided: May 9, 2016
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond Edward Chestnut, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Edward Chestnut petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his
motion for reconsideration of the order denying Chestnut’s
Motion Arresting Judgment. He seeks an order from this court to
compel the district court to act. Our review of the district
court’s docket reveals that the district court entered a text
order denying Chestnut’s motion for reconsideration on September
28, 2015. Accordingly, because the district court has recently
ruled on Chestnut’s motion, we deny the mandamus petition as
moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --