Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-2223•Theresa Washington v. RICHARD O’NEAL, Market Manager c/o Walmart
15-2223Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit21.03.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2223
THERESA WASHINGTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICHARD O’NEAL, Market Manager c/o Walmart; LOREN ROOS; ALEX
BARRON; TERESSA CHAMBERS; JOHN ENGEL; JASON TANNER; DEBORAH
PATRICK, c/o Walmart,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:15-cv-00135-JFM)
Submitted: March 17, 2016 Decided: March 21, 2016
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Theresa Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Sarah Elizabeth
Henninger, Kevin Michael Kraham, LITTLER MENDELSON PC,
Washington, DC, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Theresa Washington appeals the district court’s order
denying her motion to appoint counsel, which the court construed
as a motion to reopen her civil action. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Washington v. O’Neal, No. 1:15-
cv-00135-JFM (D. Md. Sept. 11, 2015). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.