Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-2288•Zenna McClam v. Lake City Fitness Center, f/k/a IH3 Wellness Center; HOPEHEALTH, INC.
15-2288Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31.03.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2288
ZENNA MCCLAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LAKE CITY FITNESS CENTER, f/k/a IH3 Wellness Center;
HOPEHEALTH, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge.
(4:13-cv-03316-BHH)
Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Zenna McClam, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Thomas King, KING LOVE &
HUPFER, LLC, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Zenna McClam appeals from the district court’s order adopting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. McClam v. Lake City Fitness Ctr., No. 4:13-cv-
03316-BHH (D.S.C. Sept. 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.