Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-2374•Margaret Reaves v. Seterus Inc.
15-2374Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31.03.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2374
MARGARET REAVES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SETERUS INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:15-cv-00387-FL)
Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Margaret Reaves, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Michael Rowlson,
BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Margaret W. Reaves appeals the district court’s order
granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and dismissing the action as
barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Reaves v. Seterus,
Inc., No. 5:15-cv-00387-FL (E.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.