Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-2490•Doris Mercer; Stephen Mercer v. American Airlines, Inc.
15-2490Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31.03.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2490
DORIS MERCER; STEPHEN MERCER,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
AMR CORPORATION; ALLIANZ INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:14-cv-00140-BO)
Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Doris Mercer, Stephen Mercer, Appellants Pro Se. John Mitchell
Armbruster, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL &
JERNIGAN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Doris and Stephen Mercer appeal the district court’s order
granting American Airlines’ motion for summary judgment. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, while we grant the Mercers’ motion for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Mercer v. Am. Airlines, Inc., No. 5:14-cv-
00140-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.