Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-2558•Zoumana Bakayoko v. Panera Bread
15-2558Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27.04.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2558
ZOUMANA BAKAYOKO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PANERA BREAD,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
JEFF JUDAY; HENNI; KIMBARLLY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Loretta Copeland
Biggs, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00993-LCB-LPA)
Submitted: April 7, 2016 Decided: April 27, 2016
Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Zoumana Bakayoko, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Allen Sar, John
Allen Thomas, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Zoumana Bakayoko appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his complaint with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
P. 41(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Bakayoko v. Panera Bread, No. 1:14-cv-
00993-LCB-LPA (M.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2015). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.