Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-7791•United States of America v. Samuel Paul Crook
15-7791Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.04.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7791
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
SAMUEL PAUL CROOK,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 15-7793
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
SAMUEL PAUL CROOK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1; 3:04-cr-00059-MOC-
DSC-1)
Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: April 1, 2016
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel Paul Crook, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Darren Randall,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Paul Crook appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motions filed in his related criminal cases. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Crook, Nos. 3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1;
3:04-cr-00059-MOC-DSC-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 2015). We deny
Crook’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.