Darlene J. Davis v. Comcast Corporation, Inc.; Joe Minor; Dan Simson

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1097
DARLENE J. DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMCAST CORPORATION, INC.; JOE MINOR; DAN SIMSON,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DAN THOMAS; RICO WADE,
Defendants.
No. 16-1169
DARLENE J. DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMCAST CORPORATION, INC.; JOE MINOR; DAN SIMSON,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DAN THOMAS; RICO WADE,
Defendants.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:13-cv-01513-GBL-IDD)
Submitted: June 21, 2016 Decided: June 23, 2016
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darlene J. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy McCormack, BALLARD
SPAHR, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Constantinos George
Panagopoulos, BALLARD SPAHR, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Darlene J. Davis appeals the
district court’s orders denying relief on her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60
motion to set aside judgment and her subsequently filed revised
motion to set aside judgment and motion for recusal. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.* Davis
v. Comcast Corp., No. 1:13-cv-01513-GBL-IDD (E.D. Va. filed Jan.
13, 2016 & entered Jan. 14, 2016; Jan. 28, 2016). We deny
Davis’ motion to remand in No. 16-1097. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* We note that Davis’ Rule 60(b) motions were filed
approaching the one-year deadline for filing such motions. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(c) (“A motion under Rule 60(b) must be made
within a reasonable time, [and on certain grounds] no more than
a year after the entry of the judgment of the judgment or order
. . . .”). We need not, however, rest our decision on this
basis.

-- 3 of 3 --