Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-1870•Martin L. May v. RHA, Attn: John White-Chief Ethics Compliance Ofcr.
16-1870Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18.04.2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1870
MARTIN L. MAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RHA, Attn: John White-Chief Ethics Compliance Ofcr.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00291-MR-DLH)
Submitted: March 30, 2017 Decided: April 18, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Martin L. May, Appellant Pro Se. Randall D. Avram, Jennifer Rasile
Everitt, KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON, LLP, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Martin L. May appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing May’s
employment discrimination action as time-barred. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant
May’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. May v. RHA, No. 1:15-cv-
00291-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. July 26, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.