Cx Reinsurance Company Limited, formerly known as CNA Reinsurance Company Limited v. Brayon J. Loyal

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2180
CX REINSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, formerly known as CNA
Reinsurance Company Limited,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BRAYON J. LOYAL,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
STEWART J. LEVITAS,
Defendant.
No. 16-2228
CX REINSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, formerly known as CNA
Reinsurance Company Limited,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRAYON J. LOYAL,
Defendant - Appellee,
and

-- 1 of 3 --

2
STEWART J. LEVITAS,
Defendant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:15-cv-02174-JKB)
Submitted: May 31, 2017 Decided: June 6, 2017
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
No. 16-2180 affirmed; No. 16-2228 dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Amato, IV, GOODMAN, MEAGHER & ENOCH, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Stuart M.G. Seraina, Louis P. Malick, KRAMON &
GRAHAM, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Brayon J. Loyal appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for summary
judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of CX Reinsurance Company Ltd.
(“CX Reinsurance”). CX Reinsurance cross-appeals from the same order by the district
court denying its motion to dismiss the action.
With respect to Loyal’s appeal, we have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record
and, although we grant Loyal’s motion to file the additional materials submitted with her
opening brief, we find no reversible error in the portion of the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to CX Reinsurance. Accordingly, for the reasons stated by
the district court, we affirm the district court’s order granting summary judgment. Loyal
v. CX Reinsurance Co., No. 1:15-cv-02174-JKB (D. Md. Sept. 15, 2016). Because we
affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment in CX Reinsurance’s favor, we
dismiss as moot CX Reinsurance’s cross-appeal of the denial of its motion to dismiss.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
No. 16-2180 AFFIRMED
No. 16-2228 DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --