Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-6038•United States of America v. Robert Earl Goins, a/k/a Robert Earl
16-6038Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17.05.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6038
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ROBERT EARL GOINS, a/k/a Robert Earl,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:12-cr-00669-RBH-3)
Submitted: April 4, 2016 Decided: May 17, 2016
Before KING, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Earl Goins, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham,
Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina,
Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia,
South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Earl Goins appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction
of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
United States v. Goins, No. 4:12-cr-00669-RBH-3 (D.S.C. Dec. 29,
2015); see United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 340 (4th Cir.
2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.