Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-6045•United States of America v. Charlette Dufray Johnson, a/k/a Charlotte Johnson
16-6045Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.03.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6045
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHARLETTE DUFRAY JOHNSON, a/k/a Charlotte Johnson,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt,
Senior District Judge. (7:10-cr-00093-BR-1)
Submitted: March 17, 2016 Decided: March 22, 2016
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charlette Dufray Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Harris
Cowley, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charlette Dufray Johnson appeals the district court’s order
denying her motion for release of grand jury transcripts or for
dismissal of her convictions and sentence. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Johnson, No. 7:10-cr-00093-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.