Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-6232•United States of America v. Naarl Joseph Richard, a/k/a Noel H. Richard, a/k/a Richard Earl, a/k/a Richard Narrl
16-6232Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29.06.2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6232
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
NAARL JOSEPH RICHARD, a/k/a Noel H. Richard, a/k/a Richard
Earl, a/k/a Richard Narrl,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior
District Judge. (2:09-cr-00992-PMD-1)
Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 29, 2016
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Naarl Joseph Richard, Appellant Pro Se. Nathan S. Williams,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Naarl Joseph Richard appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Richard, No. 2:09-cr-00992-PMD-1 (D.S.C.
Jan. 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.