Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
16-7231•Charles A. Williams v. Sgt. T. Crosson; C/o McDonald; C/o Godfrey; Superintendent Ryan; Lt. Burge
16-7231Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.05.2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7231
CHARLES A. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SGT. T. CROSSON; C/O MCDONALD; C/O GODFREY; SUPERINTENDENT
RYAN; LT. BURGE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:14-ct-03308-F)
Submitted: April 24, 2017 Decided: May 3, 2017
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles A. Williams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Williams’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Crosson, No. 5:14-ct-03308-F (E.D.N.C.
Sept. 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.