Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
17-1128•Nathaniel M. Costley, Sr. v. Christina Steiner
17-1128Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.05.2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1128
NATHANIEL M. COSTLEY, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHRISTINA STEINER; CITY OF WESTMINSTER; WESTMINSTER CITY
POLICE DEPARTMENT; THOMAS KOWALCZYK, Officer; PATRICIA
PARKS, Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
George L. Russell III, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01447-GLR)
Submitted: May 23, 2017 Decided: May 25, 2017
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel M. Costley, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Alan H. Silverberg, SUMMERFIELD,
WILLEN, SILVERBERG & LIMSKY LLC, Baltimore, Maryland; Ernest I. Cornbrooks,
IV, KARPINSKI, COLARESI & KARP, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel M. Costley, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his
complaint in which he asserted claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and state law.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Costley v. Steiner, No. 1:16-cv-01447-GLR (D. Md.
Jan. 4, 2017 & Jan. 26, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.