Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
17-1150•Michael Cousin v. United States of America
17-1150Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.06.2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1150
MICHAEL COUSIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
HOMELAND SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, Secretary of the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security,
Defendants – Appellees,
And
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, in his capacity of Former Secretary of the Department
of Homeland Security (Customs and Border Protection Agency); TROY MILLER;
DONALD CONROY; DENIS GRENIER; ROBERT MAIMBOURG;
CHRISTOPHER SMITH; RICHARD C. BLANKS, MD; PAUL G. PRENIER,
MD,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00365-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: June 20, 2017 Decided: June 22, 2017
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Cousin, Appellant Pro Se. Antonia Maria Konkoly, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Michael Cousin appeals from the district court’s judgment in Defendants’ favor on
Cousin’s civil claims against Defendants, including Cousin’s disability discrimination
claim brought pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A.
§§ 701 to 796l (West 2008 & Supp. 2016). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Cousin v. United States, No. 1:16-cv-00365-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. Jan. 27, 2017). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.