Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
17-2183•Solita Harrington v. Saturn Corporation
17-2183Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16.02.2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2183
SOLITA HARRINGTON,
Creditor - Appellant,
v.
SATURN CORPORATION,
Debtor - Appellee,
U.S. TRUSTEE, Greenbelt, 11,
Trustee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:17-cv-00656-PX)
Submitted: February 15, 2018 Decided: February 16, 2018
Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Solita Harrington, Appellant Pro Se. Gary Howard Leibowitz, COLE SCHOTZ, PC,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Solita Harrington appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for
reconsideration of a prior order dismissing her appeal from a bankruptcy court order
granting the debtor’s objection to Harrington’s proof of claim. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma
pauperis and we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
Harrington v. Saturn Corp., No. 8:17-cv-00656-PX (D. Md. Sept. 25, 2017). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.