Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
17-2188•Djiby Nam v. 2012, INC., d/b/a College Park Exxon
17-2188Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit16.02.2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2188
DJIBY NAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
2012, INC., d/b/a College Park Exxon,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:17-cv-01749-PX)
Submitted: February 15, 2018 Decided: February 16, 2018
Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Djiby Nam, Appellant Pro Se. Charles H. Fleischer, OPPENHEIMER, FLEISCHER &
QUIGGLE, PC, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Djiby Nam appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action as barred
by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nam v. 2012, Inc., No.
8:17-cv-01749-PX (D. Md. Sept. 25, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.