Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
17-6087•Sylvester Richardson v. R.O.S.P. MEDICAL DEPT.; DR. MILLER; SGT. PAYNE; OSBORNE, Officer; OFFICER STANLY
17-6087Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30.05.2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6087
SYLVESTER RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
R.O.S.P. MEDICAL DEPT.; DR. MILLER; SGT. PAYNE; OSBORNE, Officer;
OFFICER STANLY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:15-cv-00595-NKM-RSB)
Submitted: May 19, 2017 Decided: May 30, 2017
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sylvester Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Carlene Booth Johnson, PERRY LAW FIRM,
PC, Dillwyn, Virginia; Jessica Leigh Berdichevsky, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Sylvester Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v.
R.O.S.P. Med. Dep’t, No. 7:15-cv-00595-NKM-RSB (W.D. Va. Jan. 17, 2017). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.