Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
17-6285•United States of America v. William Deel, Jr.
17-6285Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.04.2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6285
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM DEEL, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (1:09-cr-00018-JPJ-PMS-1; 1:09-cr-00022-
JPJ-PMS-1)
Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: April 28, 2017
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinoin.
William Deel, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Zachary T. Lee, Assistant
United States Attorneys, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Deel appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
(2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Deel, Nos. 1:09-cr-00018-JPJ-PMS-1; 1:09-cr-00022-JPJ-PMS-1 (W.D. Va. May
9, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.