Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
17-6286•United States of America v. Doretha Selby-Diggs
17-6286Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31.05.2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6286
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DORETHA SELBY-DIGGS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:14-cr-00137-RBS-RJK-2)
Submitted: May 25, 2017 Decided: May 31, 2017
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Doretha Selby-Diggs, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Patrick Hudson, Assistant United States
Attorney, Newport News, Virginia; V. Kathleen Dougherty, Joseph Kosky, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Doretha Selby-Diggs appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to
compel the filing of a motion for a sentence reduction based on substantial assistance.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Selby-Diggs, No. 2:14-cr-00137-
RBS-RJK-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 13, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.