Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
17-6667•William Lee Anderson, Ii v. Philip H. Witherspoon
17-6667Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.11.2017
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6667
WILLIAM LEE ANDERSON, II,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PHILIP H. WITHERSPOON,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:15-cv-00236-MFU-JCH)
Submitted: November 16, 2017 Decided: November 22, 2017
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Lee Anderson, II, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC,
Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
William Lee Anderson, II, appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Anderson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Witherspoon, No. 7:15-cv-
00236-MFU-JCH (W.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.