Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
17-7250•Alexander Jiggetts v. Baltimore County
17-7250Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit12.01.2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7250
ALEXANDER JIGGETTS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BALTIMORE COUNTY; BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT;
DETECTIVE STEVEN INGE, In his Official and Individual Capacity;
DETECTIVE GENE STEVEN PRYOR, In his Official and Individual Capacity;
OFFICER RICHARD GARLAND, In his Official and Individual Capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-01526-JFM)
Submitted: January 5, 2018 Decided: January 12, 2018
Before KING, SHEDD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alexander Jiggetts, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Alexander Jiggetts appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jiggetts v. Balt.
Cty., No. 1:17-cv-01526-JFM (D. Md. June 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.