Brett Kimberlin v. Breitbart Holdings

18-1413Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24.08.2018

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1413
BRETT KIMBERLIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BREITBART HOLDINGS; LOS ANGELES COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S
OFFICE; ANNE INGALLS; STEPHEN COOLEY; ESTATE OF JERRY BARNES;
KENNETH TREGONING; ESTATE OF ANDREW BREITBART; STEPHEN
BANNON; LARRY SOLOV; LARRY O’CONNER; CHUCK DEFEO;
ALEXANDER MARLOW; BRANDON DARBY; ELIZABETH SHELD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:16-cv-03588-GJH)
Submitted: August 9, 2018 Decided: August 24, 2018
Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brett C. Kimberlin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Brett Kimberlin appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint with
prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kimberlin v. Breitbart Holdings, No.
8:16-cv-03588-GJH (D. Md. Mar. 13, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.