Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
18-1756•In re: Nicholas Omar Midgette
18-1756Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.10.2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1756
In re: NICHOLAS OMAR MIDGETTE,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:18-hc-02066-BO)
Submitted: October 23, 2018 Decided: October 25, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nicholas Omar Midgette, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nicholas Omar Midgette petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district
court has unduly delayed acting on his petition for a writ of error coram nobis or audita
querela. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review
of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied the petition on June 29,
2018. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Midgette’s case, we
deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.