Waddell McCollum; Lena McCollum v. Hubert Peterkin

18-1982Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit01.05.2019

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1982
WADDELL MCCOLLUM; LENA MCCOLLUM,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
HUBERT PETERKIN; TIMOTHY RUGG; SAMUEL MORANT; TIMOTHY
KAVANAUGH; STANLEY DAVIS; HOKE COUNTY; JOHN DOE #1; JOHN
DOE #2; JOHN DOE #3; JOHN DOE #4; JOHN DOE #5,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:17-cv-00965-WO-JLW)
Submitted: February 27, 2019 Decided: May 1, 2019
Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Waddell McCollum, Lena McCollum, Appellants Pro Se. Bradley O. Wood, WOMBLE
BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Waddell and Lena McCollum appeal the district court’s order denying relief on
their complaint asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and related state law
claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCollum v. Peterkin, No. 1:17-cv-
00965-WO-JLW (M.D.N.C. July 3 & July 27, 2018). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.