Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
18-2019•Afshin Bahrampour v. DIGITAL RECEIVER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., D.R.I, Inc.
18-2019Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit04.02.2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2019
AFSHIN BAHRAMPOUR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DIGITAL RECEIVER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., D.R.I, Inc.; BOEING
CORPORATION; STATE OF NEVADA; STATE OF MARYLAND; DEFENSE
INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY, agent of D.I.S.A.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Paula Xinis, District Judge. (1:18-cv-02308-PX)
Submitted: January 22, 2019 Decided: February 4, 2019
Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Afshin Bahrampour, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Afshin Bahrampour appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil
complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court
did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Bahrampour’s complaint as frivolous. See Nagy
v. FMC Butner, 376 F.3d 252, 254-55 & n.* (4th Cir. 2004) (stating standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal. We dispense with oral arguments because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.