Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
18-2062•Tom Domingo, Sr. v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, SAMR-EO-CCR Spurgeon A. Moore
18-2062Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22.01.2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2062
TOM DOMINGO, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, SAMR-EO-CCR Spurgeon A. Moore; US
EEOC, Office of Federal Operations,
Defendant - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia,
at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (2:18-cv-00004-JPB-MJA)
Submitted: January 17, 2019 Decided: January 22, 2019
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tom Domingo, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tom Domingo, Sr., appeals from the district court’s order dismissing for lack of
jurisdiction his civil action challenging an employment decision under the Veterans’
Preference Act and Veterans Employment Opportunity Act and referencing an
employment discrimination claim filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Domingo v. Dep’t of the Army,
No. 2:18-cv-00004-JPB-MJA (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 28, 2018). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.