Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
18-2343•Cecelia D. Walton v. NC DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Disability Determination Services
18-2343Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18.04.2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2343
CECELIA D. WALTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NC DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Disability
Determination Services,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:17-cv-00085-BR)
Submitted: March 8, 2019 Decided: April 18, 2019
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cecelia D. Walton, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Edward Elder, Assistant Attorney General,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Cecelia D. Walton appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her
employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Walton v. N.C.
Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., No. 5:17-cv-00085-BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 14, 2017 &
Nov. 7, 2018). We deny Walton’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.