Gregory Bader v. Mark Clifford Kurdys; Roberts & Stevens, P.a.

18-2408Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29.04.2019

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2408
GREGORY BADER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARK CLIFFORD KURDYS; ROBERTS & STEVENS, P.A.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00294-GCM)
Submitted: April 25, 2019 Decided: April 29, 2019
Before FLOYD and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Bader, Appellant Pro Se. Cynthia L. Van Horne, POYNER SPRUILL, LLP,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Bader appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his claims
against Defendants and granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants on their
breach of contract counterclaim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Bader v. Kurdys, No. 1:16-cv-00294-GCM
(W.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2017, Oct. 2, 2018, & Oct. 31, 2018). We deny Bader’s motion for a
transcript at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.